Short answer: Indian River Shores fought Vero Beach because about 3,500 town customers south of Old Winter Beach Road paid Vero Electric rates roughly 30 percent above FPL's and had no vote in city elections. The town refused to renew its 1986 franchise, sued in 2014 and petitioned the Public Service Commission in 2016, losing both times. The dispute ended when FPL bought the entire Vero Beach system in December 2018.
Why did Vero Beach provide electricity inside Indian River Shores?
The arrangement predated the town's complaints by decades. According to a Florida Public Service Commission staff memorandum in Docket No. 160049-EU, dated June 23, 2016, Vero Beach began providing electric service to Indian River Shores residents before 1968, when the town asked the city to supply water and electric power under the 1968 Contract. In 1986, Indian River Shores and Vero Beach entered into a 30-year franchise agreement that gave the city the exclusive right to run an electric system in public places in the part of the town south of Winter Beach Road.
The boundary itself came from Tallahassee. The same memo lists four PSC territorial orders, issued in 1972, 1974, 1981 and 1983, and 1988, approving agreements between Vero Beach and Florida Power & Light that divided the service area. Everything north of Old Winter Beach Road in the town was served by FPL, Veronews reported in March 2016, while everything south of it lay in Vero Beach territory.
What were Indian River Shores residents paying?
The split put neighbors on different bills. When the town sued in July 2014, Vero Beach 32963 reported that of the 4,239 electric customers in the Shores, 739 in the north end were served by FPL and 3,500 in the central and south parts paid Vero Beach rates about 30 percent higher, roughly $2 million a year in extra charges. By May 2016, Veronews put the split at 80 percent of Shores residents on Vero Electric and 20 percent on FPL.
The town's legal argument went beyond price. Indian River Shores officials said town residents had no vote in Vero Beach elections and so no voice over the utility that set their rates, and that electric profits were subsidizing Vero Beach city government, according to the 2014 Vero Beach 32963 account of the lawsuit and later Veronews reporting on town hall meetings held in the Shores Community Center in 2016.
What happened when Indian River Shores sued Vero Beach?
The opening move was a letter. By letter of July 18, 2014, the PSC memo records, Indian River Shores told Vero Beach it would not renew the franchise agreement when it expired on November 6, 2016, and that after that date the city would no longer have the town's permission to use its rights of way. The town filed suit the same month, which triggered a mandatory 100-day conflict resolution process between the two governments; mediation failed in 2015.
The circuit court sent the core question to the PSC. On November 11, 2015, Circuit Judge Cynthia Cox dismissed three of the four counts, and the Indian River Guardian reported that she let stand only the claim that Vero Electric's rates were unreasonable. The PSC memo summarizes the key ruling: the court dismissed the claim, finding that the relief requested is squarely within the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Guardian traced that authority to 1974, when the Legislature passed the Grid Bill, vesting the PSC with superior and exclusive authority over electric service territories, and reported that the case had cost Indian River Shores taxpayers more than $600,000 by then.
How did the Public Service Commission rule on the Shores territory?
The town took its case to the PSC in two steps. It filed a petition for a declaratory statement on January 5, 2016, and on March 4, 2016, a petition asking the Commission to modify the territorial orders based on changed legal circumstances under Article VIII, Section 2(c) of the Florida Constitution, arguing that Vero Beach could not serve inside Indian River Shores without the town's consent once the franchise ended. Because the town itself is not a utility, Veronews reported, it filed as a customer, citing Town Hall and other facilities served by Vero Electric.
Each side read the expiring franchise differently. Vero Beach argued that its PSC-awarded service territory was effectively permanent whether or not a franchise existed, while the town said it had only temporarily assigned electric service to Vero Beach. In 2015 the Indian River Shores Town Council also passed an ordinance claiming power to regulate Vero Electric rates after the franchise ended; Veronews reported in May 2016 that the two governments tentatively agreed to postpone that ordinance, with up to a year's notice before any use, and to place the town's rate lawsuit in abatement while the PSC case moved forward.
Indian River County ran a parallel case over its own franchise, which expired in March 2017, appealing a PSC decision to the Florida Supreme Court, which heard arguments in December 2015, according to Vero Beach 32963. The Indian River Guardian later reported that the county's argument was rejected by the state's highest court. On September 13, 2016, the Guardian reported, the Florida Public Service Commission today denied the town's request to modify the long-standing territorial orders establishing Vero Electric's service within Indian River Shores. The town had already agreed in June 2016 to end its circuit court battle with Vero Beach over rates, Veronews reported.
How did the Indian River Shores electric dispute end?
Money, not litigation, ended it. In September 2015, after FPL offered $13 million for the Shores customers, Vero Beach 32963 reported that Vero Beach countered at a mind-distorting $66 million, later trimmed to $64.5 million. By 2016 FPL's offer stood at $30 million, made up of $27 million from FPL and $3 million over three years from Shores residents through a surcharge, according to Veronews. The Vero Beach City Council rejected it in August 2016 and said it would entertain an offer at $47 million.
The November 2016 Vero Beach election changed the math. The franchise expired on November 6, 2016, and the new council began with a 4-1 vote to pursue the partial sale, Vero Beach 32963 reported on December 1, 2016. That deal was then folded into a sale of the whole system: in October 2017 the Indian River Guardian reported that the $185 million purchase and sale agreement with FPL would obligate the City to a partial sale, if a full sale cannot be completed.
The full sale went through. On June 5, 2018, the PSC decided FPL should serve the Vero Beach utility's roughly 35,000 customers in the city, a portion of the Town of Indian River Shores and part of unincorporated Indian River County, according to a PSC release. The Florida Municipal Electric Association, reposting the News Service of Florida, reported that final PSC approvals on November 27, 2018, ended the territorial agreement between the city utility and FPL, and FPL completed the purchase in December 2018, putting all of Indian River Shores on one provider.
Frequently asked questions
Which part of Indian River Shores did Vero Electric serve?
Vero Beach served the part of the town south of Old Winter Beach Road under PSC-approved territorial orders and a 1986 franchise, while FPL served the north end. In 2016 about 80 percent of Shores residents were Vero Electric customers.
Did Indian River Shores win its lawsuit against Vero Beach?
No. On November 11, 2015, Circuit Judge Cynthia Cox dismissed three of the four counts, ruling that which utility serves the town is a question for the Florida Public Service Commission, and the town later dropped its remaining rate claim.
What did the Public Service Commission decide?
On September 13, 2016, the Commission denied the town's petition to modify the territorial orders that gave Vero Beach the right to serve the southern part of Indian River Shores, despite the franchise expiring that November.
How much did FPL offer for the Indian River Shores customers?
FPL first offered $13 million in 2015, and Vero Beach countered at $66 million. FPL's later $30 million offer, including a $3 million surcharge on Shores bills, was rejected in August 2016 and revived after the November 2016 election.
When did Indian River Shores customers move to FPL?
When FPL completed its $185 million purchase of the whole Vero Beach electric system in December 2018, after final Public Service Commission approvals on November 27, 2018, that ended the city's territorial agreement with FPL.
Sources
- PSC staff recommendation, Docket No. 160049-EU, Town of Indian River Shores petition (June 23, 2016) https://floridapsc.com/pscfiles/website-files/PDF/Agendas/archive/160707cc/16070704.html Used for: Territorial orders, 1968 contract, 1986 franchise, July 18, 2014 letter, court and PSC filing dates
- Clock ticking in Shores suit over Vero electric rates (Vero Beach 32963, July 24, 2014) https://vb32963online.com/STORIES 2014/JULY 2014/VB32963_Shores_Suit_Over_Vero_Electric_Rates_Issue30_072414.html Used for: Lawsuit filing, customer split, rate difference
- Shores tries new approach to getting out from under Vero electric (Veronews, March 10, 2016) https://veronews.info/?p=88156 Used for: Old Winter Beach Road boundary, customer-standing PSC filing
- PSC sets hearing on Shores' bid to escape grasp of Vero electric (Veronews, May 19, 2016) https://veronews.info/?p=89065 Used for: 80/20 split, ordinance and suit abatement
- Vero seeks $66M to transfer Shores customers to FPL (Vero Beach 32963, September 2015) https://vb32963online.com/STORIES 2015/SEPTEMBER 2015/VB32963_Vero_Seeks_66_Million_To_Transfer_Shores_Customers_To_FPL_Issue38_091715.html Used for: $13 million offer and $66 million counter
- Court ruling strips 3 of 4 counts from Shores lawsuit against Vero Beach (Indian River Guardian, November 12, 2015) https://indianriverguardian.com/2015/11/12/court-ruling-strips-3-of-4-counts-from-shores-lawsuit-against-vero-beach/ Used for: Judge Cox ruling, Grid Bill, legal costs
- High court weighs county case against Vero electric (Vero Beach 32963, December 2015) https://vb32963online.com/STORIES 2015/DECEMBER 2015/VB32963_High_Court_Weighs_County_Case_Against_Vero_Electric_Issue51_121715.html Used for: County Supreme Court appeal and franchise expiration dates
- Shores faces long odds in challenge before Florida PSC (Veronews, June 30, 2016) https://veronews.info/?p=89616 Used for: PSC staff recommendation, end of circuit court rate case
- Public Service Commission hands Shores another setback (Indian River Guardian, September 13, 2016) https://indianriverguardian.com/2016/09/13/public-service-commission-hands-shores-another-setback/ Used for: PSC denial, $30 million and $47 million figures, Supreme Court outcome for county
- ANALYSIS: Shores mayor blasts Vero City Council on electric (Veronews, September 29, 2016) https://veronews.info/?p=90752 Used for: $27 million plus $3 million surcharge structure
- Shores could all be on FPL power by next summer (Vero Beach 32963, December 1, 2016) https://vb32963online.com/STORIES 2016/DECEMBER 2016/VB32963_Shores_Could_All_Be_On_FPL_Power_By_Next_Summer_Issue48_120116.html Used for: 4-1 vote to pursue partial sale, franchise expirations
- Council set to pull trigger on full or partial sale of Vero Electric (Indian River Guardian, October 5, 2017) https://indianriverguardian.com/2017/10/05/council-set-to-pull-trigger-on-full-or-partial-sale-of-vero-electric/ Used for: Partial-sale fallback in the full-sale contract
- Florida Public Service Commission transfers Vero Beach Electric customers to FPL (Indian River Guardian, June 6, 2018) https://indianriverguardian.com/2018/06/06/florida-public-service-commission-transfers-vero-beach-electric-customers-to-fpl/ Used for: Vero customers in a portion of Indian River Shores, June 2018 decision
- FPL Finishes Deal for Vero Beach Utility (FMEA, December 17, 2018) https://www.flpublicpower.com/news/fpl-finishes-deal-for-vero-beach-utility Used for: November 27, 2018 final approvals, territorial agreement ended, completion
